Before we go further into the summary of the book let me provide some details about these two.
Alfred Hitchcock (1899–1980) – Legendary British filmmaker, often called the “Master of Suspense.” Known for thrillers like Psycho, Vertigo, Rear Window, and The Birds. Famous for his mastery of visual storytelling, suspense, and audience manipulation.
-
François Truffaut (1932–1984) – Influential French filmmaker and critic, one of the leading figures of the French New Wave. Directed films like The 400 Blows, Jules and Jim, and Day for Night. He admired Hitchcock deeply and helped elevate his status as an auteur through the book Hitchcock/Truffaut.
In short: Hitchcock was the master filmmaker; Truffaut was the younger director-critic who interviewed him to showcase his artistry.
1. Background & Context
-
Purpose of the Book: In 1962, French New Wave director François Truffaut spent a week interviewing Alfred Hitchcock in Hollywood.
-
Why It Matters: At the time, Hitchcock was often dismissed as a mere entertainer. Truffaut wanted to prove he was a true cinematic artist.
-
Format: A series of Q&A sessions, illustrated with stills and storyboards from Hitchcock’s films.
2. Hitchcock’s Philosophy of Cinema
-
Pure Cinema: Storytelling should be visual, not overly reliant on dialogue. Images, editing, and rhythm create emotion more powerfully than words.
-
Suspense vs. Surprise: Hitchcock distinguishes between surprising an audience (a bomb suddenly explodes) and creating suspense (the audience knows a bomb is ticking under the table while characters talk casually).
-
The MacGuffin: A plot device that motivates the characters but doesn’t matter to the audience (e.g., secret papers, microfilm). What matters is the emotional journey, not the object itself.
-
Control of Audience: Hitchcock sees filmmaking as an act of manipulating emotions—fear, laughter, anxiety, relief—almost like conducting an orchestra.
3. Insights Into Hitchcock’s Films
Truffaut goes film by film, asking about creative choices, challenges, and meaning. Key takeaways:
-
Early British Films: Hitchcock’s silent works (The Lodger, Blackmail) show his early mastery of visual storytelling.
-
Hollywood Years:
-
Rebecca – struggle between Hitchcock’s style and producer David O. Selznick’s control.
-
Notorious – famous long kiss scene and the uranium MacGuffin.
-
Strangers on a Train – crossing of guilt and identity, dark psychological tension.
-
-
Masterpieces:
-
Rear Window – a meditation on voyeurism; audience as complicit observer.
-
Vertigo – obsession, illusion, and control; Hitchcock’s most personal film.
-
Psycho – radical shock of killing off the protagonist early; shower scene as pure visual music.
-
The Birds – randomness of chaos, no explanation for the attacks, reinforcing existential dread.
-
4. Hitchcock on Technique
-
Editing & Rhythm: Carefully timed cuts to maximize suspense.
-
Sound: Silence can be as powerful as music (e.g., The Birds has no traditional score).
-
Camera Movement: Used to mimic perception, guide audience attention, or trap characters psychologically.
-
Actors: Hitchcock often claimed they should be “treated like cattle,” but in reality, he sought actors who fit the mold of the characters rather than improvisers.
5. Relationship Between Hitchcock & Truffaut
-
Mutual Respect: Truffaut admired Hitchcock as a master of form; Hitchcock respected Truffaut’s passion and sharpness.
-
Generational Bridge: The conversations symbolized a dialogue between classical Hollywood cinema and the French New Wave.
-
Reputation Shift: The book helped critics re-evaluate Hitchcock as an auteur, not just a commercial entertainer.
6. Lasting Impact of the Book
-
For Filmmakers: It became a textbook for understanding visual storytelling, suspense, and audience psychology.
-
For Critics & Scholars: Elevated Hitchcock’s reputation into the canon of great directors.
-
For Audiences: Offers a peek into the mind of one of cinema’s greatest manipulators of emotion.
7. Key Takeaways
-
Cinema is an art of images, not words.
-
Suspense is stronger than surprise.
-
A MacGuffin (an unimportant plot device) matters less than the emotions it provokes.
-
Hitchcock’s films reflect deep psychological and thematic concerns, not just thrills.
-
This book reshaped film criticism and influenced generations of directors (Scorsese, Spielberg, Fincher, etc.).
In short: Hitchcock/Truffaut is more than just an interview—it’s a masterclass in filmmaking, a defense of cinema as an art, and a passionate exchange between two legendary directors.
Why burn a hole in your pocket on pricey film books when this summary gives you the gist? But here’s the deal—whether you’re a wide-eyed film student or a seasoned director, Hitchcock/Truffaut is non-negotiable reading. Don’t just flip through it—devour each chapter, then watch the films it points you to. That combo is better than most film schools. You’ll train your eyes to notice what others miss, start thinking like a master director, and walk onto set with the kind of confidence that commands a crew.

Comments
Post a Comment